Viva Zapatero

en
00:02:12
00:02:23
00:02:49
00:02:55
00:03:02
00:03:08
00:03:13
00:03:17
00:03:20
00:03:26
00:03:29
00:03:33
00:03:39 The use that Biagi...
00:03:42 ..the other guy ?
00:03:43 Santoro... okay, but the other one ?
00:03:46 ..and Luttazzi
00:03:50 paid for with public money,
00:03:53
00:03:58 Right, l work
00:04:00 not for you, Berlusconi.
00:04:03 l've been inviting Berlusconi
00:04:07 but he won't come.
00:04:09 l've even written letters
00:04:11 lt's a pity, because my first question
00:04:16 l'd ask him: ''Berlusconi,
00:04:20 Because no one knows.
00:04:22 But luckily,
00:04:25 it's called ''The Scent of Money''
00:04:29 Tonight's guest is the author,
00:04:31 Marco Travaglio.
00:04:36 l think the new administration
00:04:39 has the duty of
00:04:43 After the Travaglio interview,
00:04:48 one by Silvio Berlusconi
00:04:50 one by his party,
00:04:54 and his two corporations, Fininvest,
00:04:59 A total of 41 billion.
00:05:01 l've been trying to go back
00:05:07 l've done everything
00:05:10 l've been through every court in ltaly
00:05:14 A magistrate has requested
00:05:16 that l be reinstated in my job.
00:05:18 l haven't heard from anyone since.
00:05:21 Mr. Saccà sent the letter
00:05:25 with advice of delivery,
00:05:27 which is the thing
00:05:31 l was fired
00:05:34 by advice of delivery !
00:05:37 So l wouldn't be able to say
00:05:40 To make sure
00:05:44 - l, on behalf of my electors...
00:05:48 Yes, our coalition,
00:05:50 We believe it's a matter of freedom
00:05:54 to not have to hear
00:05:57 or Berlusconi to Mussolini,
00:06:01 Biagi did a show
00:06:05 so l can tell you
00:06:08 Berlusconi to Mussolini.
00:06:10 That cannot happen,
00:06:14 Why can't it happen ?
00:06:16 Why can't someone compare
00:06:24 Why can't someone compare...
00:06:26 at 8:30 p.m. or 12:30 p.m.,
00:06:31 Berlusconi to Mussolini ?
00:06:33
00:06:39
00:06:44
00:06:47
00:06:49
00:06:55
00:07:00
00:07:03 ls Kerry's defeat and Bush's victory
00:07:10 God willing...
00:07:12
00:07:15 ln ltaly, the production of
00:07:19 even in Lazio.
00:07:20 Oven-baked pasta,
00:07:24 From starter to dessert:
00:07:27
00:07:31
00:07:34 The Virgin Mary crying blood
00:07:38 When did your daughter
00:07:41 - The 2nd of February.
00:07:46 You mean the tears ?
00:07:48 No,
00:07:51 the vision of
00:07:54
00:07:56 No, because...
00:07:59 ..it goes along with
00:08:03 ls it serious ? What does it mean ?
00:08:05 lt means that...
00:08:10 ..there's no real opposition...
00:08:15 l don't mean
00:08:18 l mean daily life,
00:08:21 the freedom of the people.
00:08:23
00:08:27
00:08:29
00:08:33
00:08:35
00:08:39 This has been said
00:08:42 As in all of human behaviour,
00:08:45 A law like that
00:08:49 He'd just lost
00:08:52 and his coalition was saying
00:08:56 and they wanted
00:08:59 At that stage,
00:09:02 to attack him
00:09:08 would have been a risk...
00:09:13 not worth running.
00:09:15 lt was a mistake.
00:09:17
00:09:23
00:09:27
00:09:32
00:09:34
00:09:39
00:09:45
00:09:49
00:09:54
00:09:59
00:10:04
00:10:07
00:10:12
00:10:15
00:10:19
00:10:23
00:10:26
00:10:29
00:10:33 l'm especially pleased
00:10:36 lt explores satire with intelligence
00:10:41 The writing skill
00:10:46
00:10:50
00:10:55 We went into this little room
00:10:58 and he asked me
00:11:04 And then he said:
00:11:07 l thought it was a joke.
00:11:10 He said that the political climate...
00:11:15 probably wasn't appropriate...
00:11:18 it wasn't right, it was too risky...
00:11:21 l was extremely perplexed.
00:11:24
00:11:27
00:11:30
00:11:36 Ladies and gentlemen, good evening !
00:11:41
00:11:44
00:11:50 You know that ltaly
00:11:54 for freedom of information.
00:11:57 53rd out of 166 countries.
00:11:59 Has anyone mentioned that on TV ?
00:12:03 Was it on the news ?
00:12:06 lf it had been,
00:12:10 Minister Gasparri,
00:12:12 legitimises the existing monopolies
00:12:15 lt's beneficial
00:12:18 That's paranoia.
00:12:21 There was always someone at school
00:12:26 and said
00:12:29 People always find controversy.
00:12:32 l must not have explained myself...
00:12:34 Many people criticize your ''SlC'',
00:12:38 Let's use Coca-Cola as an example.
00:12:41 Coca-Cola has a dominant position
00:12:46 So does orange soda.
00:12:48 Orange soda
00:12:52 To stop Coca-Cola
00:12:55 l extend the definition ''drink''
00:12:57 like whiskey, river water,
00:13:01 Then l say:
00:13:04 Coca-Cola is no longer
00:13:07 But that's a trick.
00:13:09 But it's also a shame.
00:13:13 l don't want river
00:13:17 Coke is good as it is.
00:13:23 A message to all channels.
00:13:25 While travelling and meeting
00:13:28 many other important people
00:13:35 l've been told that in ltaly,
00:13:37 mass media
00:13:40 l want you to know,
00:13:47
00:13:50
00:13:54
00:13:59 RaiOT SHUT DOWN, lT'S WAR
00:14:02 SABlNA HAS BEEN CANCELLED
00:15:33
00:15:37
00:15:42
00:15:43
00:15:48
00:15:53
00:15:58
00:16:01
00:16:04
00:16:07
00:16:10
00:16:13
00:16:17
00:16:22
00:16:27
00:16:31
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:43
00:16:48
00:16:52 Why didn't you say you can't cancel
00:17:02 But we also had to find a way...
00:17:06 You would have been cancelled...
00:17:09 - Why ?
00:17:12 But there's no legal basis !
00:17:15 You made me look cross-eyed,
00:17:21 Your opinion of me
00:17:24 So, l haven't made myself clear !
00:17:26 As president of RAl
00:17:29 no more satire
00:17:34 l'm president and l was chosen
00:17:38 l don't count for anything
00:17:42 We need fences,
00:17:46 l studied a long time in America and
00:17:48 there's a professional who establishes
00:17:53 Sadly, in ltaly,
00:17:58 But we can do it.
00:18:01 One's freedom ends where
00:18:05 There are about five billion others.
00:18:07 With one fence per person,
00:18:11 lf you can't establish them, it means
00:18:15 to work in a public office.
00:18:17 The American language has a lovely
00:18:24
00:18:27
00:18:31 As far as ''RAlot'' is concerned,
00:18:33 there was no censorship
00:18:37 What we saw on RAl 3
00:18:40 was a long series of insults
00:18:45 to the majority
00:18:49 and the companies he's set up.
00:18:52 Therefore, it's RAl's duty
00:18:55 from the legal consequences
00:19:00 Guzzanti was wrong
00:19:02 to stage a political rally
00:19:05 for which she was paid.
00:19:07 She's an actress.
00:19:09 Guzzanti should be satisfied
00:19:13 lf she wants to change jobs
00:19:17 there's plenty of room.
00:19:19 And l must say that the average
00:19:23 that she would undoubtedly
00:19:26 Maybe that should be
00:19:29 Too late.
00:19:31
00:19:35
00:19:38 He could go with his commission
00:19:40 to the ltalian President, Ciampi,
00:19:44 and say ''A law has been broken.
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56 That's not true.
00:19:57 Many things happened with ''RAlot''.
00:20:01 We intervened
00:20:04 and forced the executives
00:20:13 to publicly deal with the problem.
00:20:16 The problem is much more general.
00:20:22 l would call it a misinterpretation
00:20:25 News isn't meant
00:20:29 but by reporters.
00:20:31 And if reporters fail to do it
00:20:34 we can't just put comedians
00:20:38 That's the problem we have to face
00:20:42 if we want to work out this matter.
00:20:45
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:54
00:20:57
00:20:59
00:21:03
00:21:07
00:21:08
00:21:13
00:21:18 l was told:
00:21:20 ''There's a difference between satire
00:21:24 People often get confused
00:21:26 between what satire is
00:21:31 and simply
00:21:35 Making fun of someone
00:21:40 For example, someone tripping,
00:21:44 messing up words,
00:21:49 someone grabbing a girl's bum,
00:21:54 What isn't satire, is making fun.''
00:21:56 What's the criteria for saying
00:21:59 You can't just say it's insulting.
00:22:01 Well, it has to be funny.
00:22:03 - lt was very funny.
00:22:05 - Satire can be bitter too.
00:22:09 lt did.
00:22:11 At least include something humorous !
00:22:14 - lt was !
00:22:17 But what's your point ?
00:22:21 News reporters
00:22:24 Satirists must accept
00:22:27 What are these ''rules of satire'' ?
00:22:30 lt's not a matter of rules,
00:22:34 Why are you talking about rules ?
00:22:37 Dario Fo says it's satire,
00:22:41 satirists and professors
00:22:45 Satire without information
00:22:48 You can't have political satire
00:22:53 Aristophanes incorporated
00:22:58 And they were called ''parabases''.
00:23:01 The best of the chorus
00:23:07 and he'd step away from the chorus,
00:23:10 get in the front row
00:23:14 and say: ''l now talk to the city''.
00:23:17 He'd say anything he wanted
00:23:22 Satire must touch the tragic
00:23:28 lt has to be about politics.
00:23:31 All important plays
00:23:37 are full of situations
00:23:41 Yet l've been prevented from doing it
00:23:45 l was told to act
00:23:48 Don't bother meddling in...
00:23:51 ''Let politicians do politics,
00:23:55 l started doing TV sketches
00:23:58 on a popular French TV show
00:24:01 called ''Nul Par Ailleurs''.
00:24:03 l did political sketches,
00:24:06 not journalism.
00:24:09 Seven or eight years later,
00:24:12 l got tired of just sketches.
00:24:14 Since it was pure entertainment,
00:24:17 the public didn't get the reasons
00:24:21 the real meaning of my work.
00:24:24 So l talked to the programmers
00:24:27 and suggested a news programme
00:24:30 that would provide the news
00:24:32 through reporting as well as sketches.
00:24:36 ln one of these sketches,
00:24:38 we killed President Chirac.
00:24:41 lt was a parody
00:24:44 of Tarantino's film ''Pulp Fiction''.
00:24:48 We called it ''Peuple Fiction'',
00:24:52 The people wanted to know
00:24:54 what happened to Chirac's promises.
00:24:58 See ? lt went off by itself.
00:25:01 Why have you screwed with us ?
00:25:04 Why have you fucked over your people ?
00:25:06 Look...
00:25:08 Have you read the ''Bible'' ?
00:25:10 ''l will fight social injustice
00:25:13 so our nation shall prosper.
00:25:15 lf l fail, the sovereign people...
00:25:17 ..shall inflict their punishment !''
00:25:20 Yes, l said that.
00:25:21 ''France For All'', Page 3, Line 14.
00:25:28 The skill lies
00:25:32 lf you say: ''You can go this far,
00:25:36 that's negotiating
00:25:40 but then it's not satire anymore.
00:25:43 Satire might upset you
00:25:45 it might be controversial,
00:25:50 but it relies on the maturity
00:25:53 and the intellectual capacity
00:28:06 The most popular shows
00:28:10 are the satirical ones
00:28:12 and that's the case throughout Europe.
00:28:15 Politics are looked down on so much
00:28:18 that satire works great.
00:28:23 There's one show
00:28:26 in a very harsh way.
00:28:29 His character is ridiculous
00:28:33 A populist,
00:28:39 This goes on in France
00:28:43 When democracy is afraid
00:28:46 fears criticism
00:28:49 and fears being laughed at,
00:28:52 it is that democracy
00:28:56 A democracy that's strong
00:28:58 fair and honest,
00:29:01 isn't afraid of being laughed at.
00:29:03 lt says: ''You're right, l messed up.''
00:29:07
00:29:11
00:29:17
00:29:20
00:29:27
00:29:32
00:29:34
00:29:39 One man has
00:29:44 ls that right ?
00:29:46 Can you talk about it or not ?
00:29:49 Not according to Berlusconi.
00:29:52 According to the Left, you can,
00:29:54 but comedians can't.
00:29:56 So who's going to talk about it ?
00:29:58 No one.
00:30:00 All that matters is
00:30:03 People mock power in France,
00:30:09 But that's non-existent in ltaly.
00:30:11 ln ltaly the main trend
00:30:14 of the press
00:30:18 is to fear the powerful,
00:30:20 and to show reverence
00:30:24 left or right-winged,
00:30:27 You said no more satire
00:30:31 l said satire is okay
00:30:33 because freedom of opinion is allowed.
00:30:36 As long as it's performed with taste.
00:30:40
00:30:43
00:30:47
00:30:49
00:30:53 Every week we enjoy watching
00:30:55 yours as well as other
00:30:58 There's only one problem.
00:31:00 lt's too polite, not harsh enough
00:31:05
00:31:08
00:31:12
00:31:14
00:31:18
00:31:23 l expected Santoro, Biagi, Luttazzi
00:31:28 would result in a revolt
00:31:33 lnterventions,
00:31:37 But none of that happened.
00:31:39 Maybe since at first...
00:31:43 no ''phone calls'' are being made,
00:31:45 it looks like everyone...
00:31:49 is against censorship.
00:31:52 But the people up high
00:31:56 to make a few phone calls
00:31:58 as long as it's all done
00:32:02 lt's always that way...
00:32:06 and then
00:32:08 The diversionary tactic this time was:
00:32:12 LET'S NOT SAY CENSORSHlP
00:32:14 ''lt's not humour, it's journalism.''
00:32:17 Then controversy grows
00:32:19 and the facts get altered.
00:32:22 lt's easier to see now
00:32:25 as you look back at the series
00:32:30 We should have considered
00:32:35 instead of focussing on one aspect
00:32:40 When the press feels that
00:32:44 a certain thing
00:32:49 they end up letting it go,
00:32:52 they react positively at first,
00:32:58
00:33:02
00:33:07 DELUSlONS OF GRANDEUR
00:33:09 lDEOLOGlCAL KlLLlNG
00:33:12 PUBLlC LlTTERER
00:33:15 TAKE YOUR PAYCHECK
00:33:18 MADWOMAN
00:33:21 MARTYR JACK-OFF SESSlONS
00:33:23
00:33:27
00:33:29
00:33:34
00:33:39
00:33:42
00:33:46 CRAP
00:33:48 The point is this...
00:33:50 l'm against mixing news and satire,
00:33:53 actually l'm against...
00:33:56 substituting one for the other
00:33:59 due to the particular abnormality
00:34:04 You can't say that
00:34:07 comedians can broadcast the news.
00:34:09 l'm not saying that the problem
00:34:13 or Sabina Guzzanti,
00:34:16 l'm saying that RAlot
00:34:19 But they cancelled it anyway.
00:34:23 You said it wasn't censorship
00:34:27 That's what amazes me.
00:34:29 Not the right to cancel it,
00:34:35
00:34:41
00:34:45
00:34:49
00:34:51
00:34:54
00:34:59
00:35:03
00:35:08 The problem is that
00:35:11 monopolies cannot exist.
00:35:13 No one is allowed to control
00:35:15 such a large amount of mass media
00:35:17 or advertising resources.
00:35:20 Then how did Berlusconi
00:35:24 His political connections and
00:35:32 Because of
00:35:34 Berlusconi enjoyed
00:35:38 and the market went crazy.
00:35:41 He bought ''Thorn Birds''
00:35:45 and no one said a word.
00:35:47 And his membership
00:35:50 was a great advantage to Berlusconi
00:35:53 because a lot of men in key positions
00:35:58 belonged
00:36:03 Even Tax Police generals
00:36:07 the ones who were supposed
00:36:11 Not all of them, obviously,
00:36:16 This brief introduction
00:36:20 ''How could Silvio Berlusconi
00:36:25 but be so untalented
00:36:29 The answer is that
00:36:35 lt has little to do
00:36:38
00:36:42
00:36:44 lf what was said were true ?
00:36:48 lmplicitly... what...
00:36:53 can we deduce from that ?
00:36:56 That our parliament
00:37:01 What can we deduce from this ?
00:37:04 That our prime minister
00:37:08 for personal wealth ?
00:37:17 lf these horrible things
00:37:22 then our leaders who allow
00:37:27 what kind of leaders are they ?
00:37:29 Leaders who
00:37:40
00:37:44
00:37:46 Good morning, can we interview you ?
00:37:49 lf you'd asked me 5 minutes ago...
00:37:52 - 3 minutes ?
00:37:55 Good morning,
00:37:58 We're conducting an inquiry
00:38:01 - We wanted your opinion.
00:38:03 So you can't say
00:38:06 - ..to justify your actions.
00:38:09 Excuse me, can we ask you
00:38:16 Seeing as the show was cancelled
00:38:20 and that the case was dismissed,
00:38:23 do you think
00:38:26 Do you realise that you've violated
00:38:30 that says everyone has
00:38:32 and that you made up an excuse
00:38:37 Your position is very interesting.
00:38:40 l'm not sure whether
00:38:43 but there must be something.
00:38:46 lf it got cancelled,
00:38:50 What ?
00:38:51 l think it was just an excuse.
00:38:55 - The Mediaset lawsuit...
00:38:58 The executives and Board
00:39:03 and found the show damaging
00:39:09 - That's why it was closed.
00:39:14 People should evaluate
00:39:17 Or l could just sue any programme
00:39:22 There were even some papers,
00:39:28 that emphasized:
00:39:31 ''RAl must defend itself
00:39:36 They wanted billions,
00:39:40 ''Let's wait and let
00:39:45 - l read that.
00:39:48 lt's outrageous
00:39:51 because you should
00:39:54 not probabilities.
00:39:56 Otherwise
00:40:00 would halt all forms of expression.
00:40:03 lf you make comments on things
00:40:07 but they don't want you
00:40:09 they sue you for billions.
00:40:12 Therefore you can never
00:40:14 and you're dragged into a long case
00:40:19 One can conclude then
00:40:22 they're admitting that corporations
00:40:50 - Have you been sued ?
00:40:52 lt was just to scare me or...
00:40:55 they would have sued the paper too.
00:40:58 But it doesn't explain
00:41:00 why one person was picked on
00:41:05 Usually the case is made
00:41:09 but they only sued me
00:41:12 which l can deal with in my work.
00:41:15 - You're used to it ?
00:41:17 Agnes wanted 10 million euros...
00:41:21 - 29.
00:41:25 Yes, because of the pay number issue.
00:41:28 And Telecom wanted billions.
00:41:31 This time
00:41:34 Cut it down just a little
00:41:37 gladly...
00:41:39 since l can afford to do it
00:41:44 At least l write about
00:41:50 - So it's our fault ?
00:41:56 You're avoiding the responsibility.
00:41:58 So we have to join Alex Zanotelli,
00:42:03 because they're the only ones
00:42:10 There's no point in writing for
00:42:14 lt's happened at least 10 times,
00:42:17 They send you out on a job,
00:42:21 You take notes and they only publish
00:42:25 - Maybe.
00:42:28 Who said l don't ? But...
00:42:32 You should rebel !
00:42:35
00:42:37
00:42:40
00:42:44 The surprise.
00:42:48 Good evening.
00:42:51 Can we hear a duet
00:42:54 Let's do a world premiere,
00:42:56 something never done before
00:43:00 Did you write the lyrics ?
00:43:02 This song
00:43:05 Let's put the mike here,
00:43:08 Move the mike away,
00:43:13 l just can't describe
00:43:17 My paper asked me
00:43:21 on TV programmes
00:43:25 l just can't describe
00:43:29 to the French public.
00:43:31 There's no equivalent.
00:43:33 There is no single figure
00:43:39 so much real power...
00:43:44 That doesn't exist so l've never
00:43:48 For me, TV journalism doesn't mean
00:43:50 talking about cheese
00:43:52 or giving the microphone
00:43:55 to whoever's in power at the moment.
00:43:57 Journalism is independent,
00:44:00 And, above all,
00:44:05 A politician from the Left
00:44:09 but the second question is crucial
00:44:13 lt exposes him !
00:44:40 ltalian journalists today
00:44:44 but they often
00:44:48 lt's sad to say,
00:44:53 of not getting to the bottom of things
00:44:58 and not making a decision...
00:45:00 makes journalism in ltaly
00:45:04 as despicable a profession
00:45:08 Hello, Minister.
00:45:10 Can we talk for a minute ?
00:45:12 lt's the one year anniversary
00:45:16 The judge threw the case out
00:45:21 so why can't we go back on the air ?
00:45:23 The show being suspended
00:45:27 l think you said questionable things
00:45:30 but there was no
00:45:32 lt was satire, that isn't required.
00:45:35 This is a serious matter.
00:45:37 Satire is one thing,
00:45:40 And that was satire.
00:45:43 - lt's like that in every country.
00:45:45 You mentioned this law without
00:45:48 That was your choice,
00:45:52 A law the President did not sign !
00:45:54 lt was approved by parliament
00:45:57 The law l mentioned
00:46:00 - ..and wasn't signed.
00:46:04 Turn off the cameras...
00:46:06 Okay, it's true.
00:46:08 l didn't write or even read my law.
00:46:10 l just can't !
00:46:12 l start reading it at night
00:46:16 - You pass out.
00:46:19 lt's crazy !
00:46:21 - Can you do me a favour ?
00:46:24 Could you write a summary,
00:46:28 Just like twenty pages
00:46:33 And while you're at it...
00:46:35 since some of your questions
00:46:40 write down some hard questions
00:46:44 Like: ''People say someone
00:46:49 Exactly...
00:46:51 - lt would put you on the spot ?
00:46:55 l'd have to say:
00:46:59 People don't want to hear
00:47:02 insults and gratuitous spite.
00:47:04 But viewing figures were high,
00:47:07 people liked it.
00:47:08 People don't want to hear...
00:47:13 The camera's not on me anymore, so...
00:47:16 - Here it is.
00:47:18 The public doesn't want to hear...
00:47:21 But people do,
00:47:23 Satire can't be insulting.
00:47:27 People want that, you can't deny it.
00:47:31 The public liked it.
00:47:33 No, l don't think people want to see
00:47:38 Have you asked the public ?
00:47:42 Thousands of people.
00:47:45 Look, l'm a colleague
00:47:49 and he's from the Centre-Right.
00:47:52 You asked to cancel it,
00:47:56 l discussed it with your father,
00:48:01 l'm an adult,
00:48:04 No, but since he's a senator...
00:48:08 one might want to consult him too.
00:48:11 - What's your point ?
00:48:14 we all represent our electorate.
00:48:18 The electorate didn't elect you
00:48:21 and to monopolize the media.
00:48:23 - They wouldn't have voted for you.
00:48:26 But that's what you've done.
00:48:28 Santoro, Biagi, Luttazzi,
00:48:30 anyone who has a different opinion
00:48:33 Those who can't express themselves
00:48:36 are in parliament or somewhere else
00:48:38 saying what
00:48:42 Why is there no point ? Who says
00:48:47 Lilli Gruber, Santoro
00:48:51 all use TV as a means
00:48:55 l was politically active
00:48:59 so you can do the same.
00:49:01 But l'm not active in a party,
00:49:04 l'm fighting for people to know
00:49:08 l'm fighting so people
00:49:12 l want to exercise
00:49:16 People have a right to express
00:49:20 And l want to exercise
00:49:23 You don't criticize,
00:49:25 ..that l don't agree with
00:49:29 That isn't satire,
00:49:33 - Name one vulgar thing.
00:49:35 l won't forget it.
00:49:39 Can you guarantee that everything
00:49:43 lf you say something interesting.
00:49:47 We haven't finished.
00:49:51 Haven't you found anything
00:49:54 Goodbye and good luck.
00:49:56 Good luck to all us ltalians
00:50:00 See you when you get your show back
00:50:03 How will l get it back
00:50:08 As soon as possible,
00:50:11 But you cancelled my show,
00:50:15 You cancelled the show.
00:50:22 lt didn't work out for you !
00:50:24 lt wasn't a coming into office,
00:50:28 l always wrote in my editorials
00:50:32 that in this sense,
00:50:34 their concept is revolutionary.
00:50:36 Technically.
00:50:38 Revolutionary in the ''Thatcherist''
00:50:42 Or even more...
00:50:47 This man is the prime minister
00:50:50 lt's all mine:
00:50:52 l pass the laws l want, everything...
00:50:56 Of course l am a fascist.
00:50:59 So what ? Fascism is good !
00:51:02 Fuck everyone !
00:51:03 Such a catastrophe
00:51:08 We had the habit in our house
00:51:10 to bind the newspapers
00:51:18 When l was little
00:51:23 and get these big books
00:51:29 l used to wonder
00:51:34 At first there were so many people
00:51:40 and even joined the Resistance,
00:51:43 They'd say very weak things like:
00:51:47 ''Despite everything,
00:51:53 And that is how l realized
00:51:57 Going through all the pages
00:52:01 l saw the rise of fascism
00:52:06 Each volume
00:52:10 And so on.
00:52:14 And at the final issue of that year,
00:52:19 lL DUCE FOUNDS AN EMPlRE
00:52:22 Back then, persuasion meant
00:52:26 Now persuasion is intimidating
00:52:32 until you realize
00:52:35 along with your future,
00:52:39 You see people who get rewarded
00:52:44 so you decide
00:52:46
00:52:50
00:52:55
00:52:59
00:53:03
00:53:06
00:53:09
00:53:12
00:53:15
00:53:21 A regime wins points
00:53:25 when the opposition keeps quiet.
00:53:30 They think that by keeping quiet
00:53:33 and putting up with
00:53:39 l don't mean deportations
00:53:44 but instances of censorship
00:53:50 Believing that being the opposition
00:53:54 ''Lowering your tone'', etc.
00:53:56 This strengthens the regime
00:53:59 and its power of impunity.
00:54:01 That is historical experience.
00:54:05 Can we list some cases of censorship
00:54:11 We all know the personal cases.
00:54:14 They chose a few
00:54:18 Like Biagi, Santoro,
00:54:21 Sabina Guzzanti and Paolo Rossi.
00:54:24 - More money !
00:54:27 More and more money !
00:54:29 l took this farce of Molière's
00:54:34 l'm one of you,
00:54:37 Someone who used to be
00:54:40 and who's now
00:54:44 l'm here, but especially...
00:54:47 We had 1 .2 million viewers
00:54:52 The next day
00:54:54 asking why it was interrupted
00:54:58 l called RAl
00:55:01 ln the first press release,
00:55:05 and in the second,
00:55:11 We believe in freedom
00:55:13 in all its multiple and vital forms.
00:55:18 Even taking away freedoms
00:55:22 For the first time,
00:55:26 of censor censuring
00:55:31 and refuse to let the thing die.
00:55:37 So l decided to file a lawsuit.
00:55:39 Ferruccio De Bortoli is a perfect
00:55:44 They established a precedent.
00:55:46 They can fire
00:55:48 even if they don't own it.
00:55:50 l gave up the editorship
00:55:55 lt was a completely
00:56:00 lt's no secret that l had problems
00:56:04 and it's no secret
00:56:08 with various lawsuits.
00:56:12 l must say that l find this
00:56:16 of a pathology in the system.
00:56:21 Unfortunately in ltaly,
00:56:26 of ''who doesn't agree with me,
00:56:30 therefore allied with
00:56:34 You can't have professionals
00:56:36 who are allowed to perform
00:56:41 We've lost the ''Corriere''
00:56:43 and ltalian democracy
00:56:45 has lost its most
00:56:49 The newspaper is lost.
00:56:51 The new editor-in-chief
00:56:55 but he is not like
00:57:01 lt's a scandal
00:57:08 ..and Santoro.
00:57:10 Excuse me.
00:57:16 lf they're capable
00:57:20 they could easily fire us,
00:57:23 And no one could do anything,
00:57:27 not even raise an eyebrow
00:57:31 Then we got involved with
00:57:36 at TG1 , radio news reports...
00:57:39 Often editors say
00:57:41 ''l got a 'phone call'.
00:57:43 We can't talk about this anymore''.
00:57:44 lt happens all the time,
00:57:47 - This seriously ?
00:57:50 Entire stories
00:57:53 Even page formats !
00:57:55 News stories aren't prioritised
00:57:59 lt's a completely different matter,
00:58:04 And there are cases
00:58:07 like what happened with Channel 7,
00:58:10 ''Since Channel 7
00:58:13 let's kill it from the start,
00:58:17 We'll have someone
00:58:22 we'll do favours for him,
00:58:25 We'll make sure he doesn't call
00:58:30 otherwise it's pointless.''
00:58:32 ls the prime minister happy about
00:58:35 - Are you happy ?
00:58:38 - What the hell are you saying ?
00:58:41 - lt's a disgrace !
00:58:44 ls the profit for me
00:58:48 - Someone else.
00:58:50 - l see...
00:58:54 - How ?
00:58:57 But, Mr Prime Minister...
00:59:00 You either have democracy,
00:59:04 The two things
00:59:08 lf what happened to people
00:59:12 Tagliafico, Rossi, etc, etc,
00:59:24 all our members of parliament...
00:59:27 would have nailed themselves
00:59:31 They would have gone
00:59:36
00:59:38
00:59:44 Let's say right now...
00:59:52 RAl...
00:59:57 is noticing...
01:00:02 some restriction on pluralism
01:00:05 that l'll have to explain better...
01:00:09 The opposition is somehow
01:00:12 the rules of the game
01:00:14 because they accepted them.
01:00:16 Because they're playing the game.
01:00:19 Because from that point of view,
01:00:25 one side decided
01:00:30 To stop pressing the question
01:00:33 as long as they could keep
01:00:37 l don't think the opposition
01:00:40 lf tomorrow all the present
01:00:45 they'd still make 90% of the same
01:00:50 and would still be trying
01:00:55 The opposition has to realize
01:01:00 a revolution of the ltalian
01:01:03 They need to give up
01:01:07 Zapatero was elected
01:01:09 and immediately started
01:01:13 that let the prime minister
01:01:18 l hope that is irreversible
01:01:20 and that people in ltaly want it too
01:01:24 if it ever does.
01:01:26 Because it's not tolerable
01:01:29 that political parties
01:01:32 The problem goes beyond Berlusconi
01:01:36 because politicians took
01:01:38 long before Berlusconi
01:01:42 He got involved and took advantage
01:01:45 of a situation
01:01:49 That's why Centre-Left parties
01:01:55 about this kind of logic,
01:01:58
01:02:02
01:02:05 Berlusconi knows that in 1994
01:02:12 his corporation wouldn't be touched
01:02:16 He knows and
01:02:21 But you called us
01:02:25 even though we didn't pass
01:02:29 we allowed Berlusconi to run
01:02:32 and Mediaset's sales jumped
01:02:36 25-fold !
01:02:40
01:02:44
01:02:46 Some of the laws
01:02:48 most detrimental to the Centre-Left
01:02:51 and most favourable
01:02:54 were made
01:02:57 l'm talking about
01:03:01 laws regarding public television
01:03:06 the shelving of
01:03:11 the laws on conflict of interest.
01:03:14 Why did Berlusconi cause the
01:03:18 the Centre-Left made laws
01:03:21 that were not in
01:03:25 but were laws that Berlusconi
01:03:32
01:03:34
01:03:37
01:03:40
01:03:43
01:03:46 Why were so many of them persuaded
01:03:52 that it's wrong and damaging
01:03:56 to so passionately deal with
01:03:58 the man that is so determined
01:04:02 to ruin the country,
01:04:07 and regurgitate fascism,
01:04:11 moral, psychological
01:04:15 as well as pre-Nazi thought
01:04:20 Why must one want
01:04:25 with someone
01:04:28 we don't want to listen to
01:04:33 This is the mystery
01:05:20
01:05:23
01:05:25
01:05:28
01:05:31
01:05:35 Think about me,
01:05:37 who by law cannot run for office
01:05:42 or even become a representative, is
01:05:47 That is so exhilarating !
01:05:49 This should give
01:05:54 Just relax.
01:05:56 Using money nobody knows
01:06:01 And even though everyone knew it,
01:06:05 The opposition was elected
01:06:07 so they'd pass a law
01:06:10 and they didn't even do it !
01:06:14 They see all my china
01:06:19 So l generously tell them:
01:08:35 Yes.
01:08:48
01:08:53
01:08:59
01:09:02
01:09:06
01:09:10
01:09:15
01:09:18 l want to be free to talk and listen.
01:09:21 Since RAl
01:09:24 we had to go somewhere
01:09:27 We're here to protect
01:09:49 The funny thing is that we didn't
01:10:00 l've gone up and down
01:10:03 You can't imagine
01:10:06
01:10:09
01:10:14
01:10:18 - Tell them there's no more room.
01:10:22 They can see it there.
01:10:29 - Do you see it ?
01:10:40 Hello and thanks for coming.
01:10:48 l'd like to tell
01:10:55 that you alone are 15,000 people.
01:10:59 They go all the way to the bus stop.
01:11:06 Revolution is possible
01:11:08 ln this white light.
01:11:10 lt's not a coincidence
01:11:17 The Centre-Left
01:11:20 They should run
01:11:25 lf they don't,
01:11:29 When the Left was in power,
01:11:36
01:11:38
01:11:42
01:11:46
01:11:48
01:11:53
01:12:01
01:12:04
01:12:23
01:12:26
01:12:29
01:15:12