Zizek

en
00:00:23 What would be my...
00:00:25 spontaneous attitude
00:00:27 It's a very dark one.
00:00:29 The first thesis would have been
00:00:32 a kind of total vanity:
00:00:34 There is nothing, basically.
00:00:37 I mean it quite literally,
00:00:39 like... ultimately...
00:00:43 there are just some fragments,
00:00:45 some vanishing things.
00:00:46 If you look at the universe,
00:00:48 it's one big void.
00:00:49 But then how do things emerge?
00:00:51 Here, I feel a kind
00:00:55 with quantum physics,
00:00:57 where, you know,
00:00:59 is that universe is a void,
00:01:01 but a kind of a positively
00:01:04 And then particular things
00:01:07 when the balance of the void
00:01:10 And I like this idea
00:01:13 that the fact that it's
00:01:16 Things are out there.
00:01:18 It means something
00:01:19 that what we call creation
00:01:22 is a kind of a cosmic imbalance,
00:01:26 that things exist by mistake.
00:01:28 And I'm even ready
00:01:30 and to claim that the only way
00:01:34 is to assume the mistake
00:01:37 And we have a name for this.
00:01:40 Isn't love precisely this kind
00:01:44 I was always disgusted
00:01:46 of "I love the world,"
00:01:49 I don't like the world.
00:01:50 I don't know how...
00:01:52 Basically, I'm somewhere
00:01:54 or "I'm indifferent towards it."
00:01:56 But the whole of reality,
00:01:59 It's stupid. It is out there.
00:02:02 Love, for me,
00:02:05 Love is not "I love you all."
00:02:08 Love means I pick out something,
00:02:11 and it's, again,
00:02:14 Even if this something
00:02:17 a fragile individual person...
00:02:19 I say "I love you
00:02:22 In this quite formal sense,
00:03:15 They inform me
00:03:34 Think about the strangeness
00:03:36 30, 40 years ago,
00:03:39 about what the future will be:
00:03:41 Communist, Fascist,
00:03:43 Today, nobody even
00:03:46 We all silently accept
00:03:56 On the other hand,
00:03:58 with cosmic catastrophes:
00:04:00 The whole life on Earth
00:04:02 because of some virus,
00:04:04 because of an asteroid
00:04:07 So the paradox is that
00:04:08 it's much easier to imagine
00:04:13 than a much more modest
00:04:17 which means that we should
00:04:21 but in what sense?
00:04:27 There are two false
00:04:33 One is this old notion
00:04:38 which we know will never
00:04:40 The other is the capitalist Utopia
00:04:42 in the sense of new
00:04:45 that you are not only allowed
00:04:47 but even solicited to realize.
00:04:50 The true Utopia is when
00:04:55 without a way to resolve it
00:04:57 within the coordinates
00:05:00 that out of the pure
00:05:03 you have to invent a new space.
00:05:05 Utopia is not kind of
00:05:08 Utopia is a matter
00:05:11 You are forced to imagine it
00:05:15 and this is what we need today.
00:05:34 I hope I wasn't too long.
00:05:36 I thank you very much
00:05:50 Another very short comment
00:05:56 You know why I applauded?
00:05:59 If you watch old
00:06:03 you will see a big difference
00:06:05 between a Fascist
00:06:07 The Fascist leader,
00:06:10 he just accepts it.
00:06:16 The Stalinist leader
00:06:21 The message being
00:06:24 I'm just your tool. We are all
00:06:26 And this was my side.
00:07:00 So we are on. Okay.
00:07:06 The worst thing is to play
00:07:11 that some intellectuals
00:07:13 You project a certain
00:07:16 cold thinker, whatever...
00:07:17 but then you signal,
00:07:20 "You know, but nonetheless,
00:07:22 I like small pleasures of life.
00:07:24 I'm human like you.
00:07:25 I'm not human.
00:07:28 It's not that I have a mask
00:07:31 and beneath,
00:07:33 I like chocolate cake,
00:07:37 which makes me human.
00:07:39 I'd rather prefer myself
00:07:43 not to offend others,
00:07:45 pretends... plays
00:08:03 You come in?
00:08:05 I hid it, of course.
00:08:08 It means "Welcome to welfare,"
00:08:12 A good, honest guy.
00:08:14 I put everything here...
00:08:16 By everything, I mean...
00:08:18 Look even here it is.
00:08:21 Isn't it a crazy combination?
00:08:22 You have this,
00:08:25 The clothes are here.
00:08:26 But it's not only clothes.
00:08:28 It's also...
00:08:31 covers, sheets for the...
00:08:34 No, no. Everything is here.
00:08:37 Here. Isn't this nice,
00:08:41 Here are socks, underwear.
00:08:43 This is all my stuff,
00:08:45 and basically,
00:08:47 Newspapers, journals.
00:08:49 These are my books
00:08:52 Two copies of each one.
00:08:54 So this is strictly prohibited.
00:08:56 It looks bad.
00:08:59 I think they are lower there,
00:09:01 because this is
00:09:04 - Oh, this is...
00:09:07 I am narcissist here.
00:09:10 - Do you keep...
00:09:12 This should go elsewhere.
00:09:14 I'm sorry. I just...
00:09:17 so this is there.
00:09:19 Okay, if you need
00:09:22 Ah, yes, there are some of them here.
00:09:24 Let's see what's here,
00:09:26 because these are
00:09:28 These are some early
00:09:32 Ah, this is from
00:09:34 Yes. Mid-'80s, I started
00:09:37 For two years,
00:09:40 that I was the most influential.
00:09:42 But then new political
00:09:45 and I was too combative,
00:09:48 This was me.
00:09:50 This was my fame.
00:09:52 I worked like crazy
00:09:54 because I was writing
00:09:57 I never wanted to endanger,
00:10:01 which is why I was
00:10:03 in any kind of political career,
00:10:05 because it simply takes time.
00:10:52 Two days before the election,
00:10:55 there was a big round table
00:10:58 20 of them,
00:11:08 A right wing naive good guy,
00:11:12 made a fatal mistake,
00:11:15 which everybody remembered.
00:11:17 Not even a mistake,
00:11:19 Namely, as usual,
00:11:21 I talked quite a lot,
00:11:23 and then this guy wanted
00:11:26 and turned to me...
00:11:28 this was all live, big debate,
00:11:49 "Listen, we all know
00:11:52 that your I.Q. Is twice as all
00:11:56 but nonetheless, could you
00:12:00 But everybody remembered
00:12:02 You see?
00:12:03 Even they admit
00:12:05 I remember then, you know,
00:12:08 when the lights went off,
00:12:10 all other candidates started
00:12:13 like "Are you idiot?
00:12:16 Because then I jumped up
00:12:18 and almost got elected.
00:12:51 When I first visited the States,
00:12:54 I was shocked
00:12:55 "IDEOLOG Y"
00:12:58 Romanticism onwards.
00:13:00 That was the idea
00:13:03 Anglo-Saxon economy,
00:13:07 German metaphysics,
00:13:10 as the basic...
00:13:12 spiritual stances of Europe.
00:13:15 Sorry. That's it.
00:13:18 French politics, revolutionary:
00:13:20 Shit should disappear
00:13:23 Anglo-Saxon/American:
00:13:26 German metaphysic poetry, inspection:
00:13:29 You inspect,
00:13:31 So isn't it totally crazy
00:13:33 that in a vulgar,
00:13:36 you find certain differences
00:13:40 which you truly cannot account
00:13:44 but you have to evoke all this.
00:13:46 I mean, you claim,
00:13:49 at a conference
00:13:51 Then you go to the toilet,
00:13:54 You are up to your shit,
00:13:56 or how do you put it
00:14:10 Who believes what today?
00:14:12 I think this is
00:14:14 much more complex
00:14:19 The first myth to be
00:14:23 is the idea that we live
00:14:26 where nobody
00:14:29 and that there were some times,
00:14:32 where people still believed,
00:14:34 relied of some sort
00:14:37 and so on and so on.
00:14:38 I think it's today
00:14:42 and, as Fuller develops it
00:14:45 the ultimate form of belief
00:14:48 Why? Again, I'm going back
00:14:50 to that question
00:14:52 Look how it functions,
00:14:56 in its standard version,
00:14:59 You cannot find
00:15:02 without "A,"
00:15:04 and "B," all of this
00:15:09 Like... I don't know.
00:15:11 To take an ironic example,
00:15:13 if somebody like Judith Butler
00:15:16 were to be asked "What is this?"
00:15:18 She would never have said,
00:15:22 She would have said
00:15:23 "If we accept
00:15:28 of language identifying
00:15:32 and taking all this into account,
00:15:34 then may we not"...
00:15:35 she likes to put it
00:15:38 "...reach the hypothesis that,
00:15:39 in the conditions
00:15:42 this can be said to be
00:15:49 So it's always this need
00:15:51 It goes even for love,
00:15:53 like nobody almost dares
00:15:56 It has to be,
00:15:58 "I love you," or some kind
00:16:01 But what's the problem here?
00:16:02 The problem is that...
00:16:05 why this fear?
00:16:07 Because I claim that,
00:16:08 when the ancients
00:16:13 they meant exactly the same.
00:16:15 All these distanciations
00:16:17 So it's we today who are afraid
00:16:20 that, if we were to put it
00:16:23 that it would mean too much.
00:16:25 We believe in it.
00:17:35 You know what I learned
00:17:37 - What?
00:17:38 - You know why Russian?
00:17:39 It's so disgusting,
00:17:42 Because all my friends...
00:17:43 took either French or German
00:17:46 Okay, my idea was, you know,
00:17:48 there was a code word
00:17:51 Isn't it good to play it safe?
00:17:52 Whoever wins, I will
00:17:55 There were three levels
00:17:58 The first in theory...
00:17:59 I mean, if you dealt with theory
00:18:03 The first level was,
00:18:06 This was the first level
00:18:08 The second level were,
00:18:09 "Are you allowed to publish books?"
00:18:12 The third level was,
00:18:13 "Are you allowed to get a job
00:18:17 And the fourth level is,
00:18:18 you are arrested
00:18:20 I was between the second and third.
00:18:22 My God, I was unemployed.
00:18:24 It was humiliating.
00:18:25 I was 27, and my parents
00:18:30 Then for two years,
00:18:31 it was that humiliating job
00:18:34 They knew that I am not
00:18:36 and that I will probably succeed.
00:18:38 So they were afraid
00:18:41 and succeed there.
00:18:43 This would then be bad for...
00:18:44 you know, another victim
00:18:46 to make a career in Slovenia.
00:18:47 So they want me
00:18:51 but there in Slovenia.
00:18:52 It was in a way
00:18:54 but they didn't know
00:18:57 they made it even easier
00:19:04 Give him 7. It's okay.
00:19:06 Oh, sorry.
00:19:08 Okay. "Gracias."
00:19:14 - This is it.
00:19:15 - Oh, my God!
00:19:16 I thought this would be
00:19:19 with Peron and...
00:19:20 not Peron, with Borges
00:19:22 Oh, yeah. No, it's super-modern.
00:19:24 Oh, my God, I didn't like
00:19:27 It's only an idiot coming.
00:19:30 - I really hate this.
00:19:33 I hate when...
00:19:35 I think that idiot...
00:19:38 recognized me,
00:19:40 because then they stare.
00:19:43 They descend on you?
00:19:44 Oh, my God.
00:19:47 - To whom do I put it to?
00:19:53 - Thank you.
00:19:57 Did you ever expect this,
00:19:59 No, but that's what
00:20:01 I cannot tell you
00:20:04 You don't love it
00:20:06 No, no, no, no, no.
00:20:07 I think people are evil.
00:20:09 This is horrible.
00:20:12 You see all these creeps,
00:20:15 This is horrible.
00:20:16 Who's that hysterical woman?
00:20:18 She's a fan, Slajov.
00:20:20 Yeah, but what is she doing here?
00:20:22 She should go up there
00:20:24 not annoying me here.
00:21:39 It was simply made
00:21:42 supposed to present
00:21:45 to a wide public,
00:21:46 I think for
00:21:49 of the French state TV.
00:22:08 What I appreciate
00:22:10 is this inversion...
00:22:14 between public image and private.
00:22:17 It's this total denigration...
00:22:20 disappearance of this
00:22:24 This for me is the idea
00:22:29 The central idea
00:22:31 is not these ideas determine you...
00:22:34 you are a Christian,
00:22:36 today liberal, I don't know.
00:22:38 But the idea is precisely
00:22:40 that ideological propositions
00:22:45 We cannot be reduced
00:22:48 There is a warm human being behind.
00:22:51 I think this is ideology
00:22:53 The most horrible
00:22:57 and really horrible, terrifying...
00:22:58 is to fully identify
00:23:02 The ultimate act is what we think
00:23:07 There is the true acting,
00:23:09 and usually, our truth
00:23:12 to that to which we are
00:23:16 is in our acts
00:23:17 more than importance
00:23:21 So again, my point
00:23:23 I like philosophy
00:23:26 not as this kind of...
00:23:29 look at the way he moves now,
00:23:32 I find this ridiculous.
00:23:34 He emphasizes
00:23:36 "One cannot say all the truth.
00:23:40 It's impossible materially."
00:23:44 This ridiculous emphasis.
00:23:46 I think it's pure fake,
00:23:49 as if he makes a deep point there.
00:23:51 He does not.
00:23:58 I think Lacan,
00:24:00 what interests me
00:24:03 The underlying logic,
00:24:06 His style is a total fake, I think.
00:24:09 I try to forget it.
00:24:11 Maybe it works as a strategy.
00:24:13 At a certain point,
00:24:15 First, you have to seduce people
00:24:16 with obscure statements,
00:24:17 but I hate
00:24:19 I'm a total
00:24:21 I believe in clear statements.
00:24:23 And I'm for Lacan because, again,
00:24:27 it's not that Lacan
00:24:29 in the sense that there is
00:24:32 The whole point of my work
00:24:35 is that you can translate Lacan
00:24:41 Well, I've just had enough of this.
00:24:52 Now, live from the CN8 Studios,
00:24:55 This is CN8 Nitebeat,
00:24:59 Jacques Lacan was
00:25:02 He makes Freud sound
00:25:05 Lacan's theory
00:25:07 is so complicated,
00:25:08 it makes my teeth hurt
00:25:10 Slavoj Zizek is a philosopher
00:25:13 at the University
00:25:17 I think I said this fairly close
00:25:20 who has written a book called
00:25:23 The book takes a look
00:25:27 from the viewpoint
00:25:30 or at least that's
00:25:32 Welcome, Mr. Zizek.
00:25:34 Did I say that...
00:25:36 Slavoj Zizek, but again,
00:25:40 It makes me paranoid
00:25:43 This is the most complicated book
00:25:46 Strange, because the goal
00:25:48 is, on the contrary,
00:25:49 to make Lacan back into someone
00:25:53 whom even your grandma
00:25:56 Let's say you have a good
00:25:58 It's Sunday afternoon.
00:26:01 The father would...
00:26:04 will tell you, "Listen,
00:26:08 if you are a small kid, of course...
00:26:09 "I don't care how you feel.
00:26:11 - You have to go"...
00:26:13 "Going Grandmother
00:26:15 - Okay.
00:26:18 Nothing is broken.
00:26:20 But let's say you have
00:26:21 the so-called tolerant
00:26:23 What he will tell you
00:26:25 "You know how much
00:26:29 but nonetheless, you should
00:26:32 if you really want to."
00:26:34 Now, every child
00:26:36 and they are not idiots...
00:26:37 know that this apparent
00:26:39 secretly contains an even more
00:26:44 "Not only you have
00:26:47 but you have to like it."
00:26:48 I'm beginning to like this book
00:26:51 That's one example
00:26:53 of how apparent tolerance,
00:26:56 can conceal a much stronger order.
00:27:00 So we should go back
00:27:02 to more like the dad that just says
00:27:04 Absolutely. It's more honest.
00:27:06 You went to the McDonald breakfast?
00:27:09 This is not so ridiculous.
00:27:11 Look what you get.
00:27:17 You know, you get this
00:27:19 Yeah, to make you happy.
00:27:20 Yeah, but this is for the kids.
00:27:21 I go there to make him happy.
00:27:24 He pretends to be happy there
00:27:26 But what the hell.
00:27:28 This means that, again, you know,
00:27:31 I love him, but my perspective
00:27:34 We go there, up and down,
00:27:38 No, it's pure desperate
00:27:41 - Right.
00:27:43 without getting
00:27:45 and this is easy,
00:27:47 and shuts up for 20 minutes
00:27:50 - What does he get nervous about?
00:27:52 Okay, this will go.
00:27:58 He's perplexed, as you can see.
00:28:10 Now he's narcissistically amused.
00:28:17 It's just to keep him calm,
00:28:21 so it's eating, it's this,
00:28:24 Or at least negotiating.
00:28:26 Yesterday, he was building
00:28:28 He wasn't satisfied with them,
00:28:30 but then he gave me the role
00:28:32 of just collecting a certain type
00:28:35 I start to shoot at the animals,
00:28:38 then... I love this one,
00:28:41 You know, this one,
00:28:42 I don't know where,
00:28:44 You can open it, you see?
00:28:46 And put soldiers in
00:28:47 so that then he attacks me
00:28:51 He destroyed this castle
00:28:54 This was his original,
00:28:57 but destruction is very precise.
00:28:59 It's incredible how you think
00:29:02 But he's the big wise guy.
00:29:04 He observes.
00:29:06 Here, he's very profane.
00:29:09 He wanted to have a woman
00:29:13 Then he said,
00:29:16 Why not have two girls?"
00:29:18 This is the two girls talking.
00:29:20 You see, lesbian, progressive,
00:29:23 Two lesbians, and...
00:29:27 but I like this one.
00:29:29 Isn't this a beautiful one?
00:29:30 I bought it in Greece.
00:29:31 A kind of a nice old Roman.
00:29:44 Over. Let's show them all, huh?
00:30:02 Okay, philosophy.
00:30:05 This, I can do it,
00:30:07 at least traditionally,
00:30:18 Philosophy
00:30:20 The duty of philosophy
00:30:23 but to redefine problems,
00:30:26 to show how what we experience
00:30:29 is a false problem.
00:30:30 If what we experience
00:30:33 is a true problem,
00:30:34 then you don't need philosophy.
00:30:35 For example, let's say
00:30:37 that now there would be
00:30:40 coming from out there in space,
00:30:42 so not in any way mediated
00:30:44 and it would threaten all of us.
00:30:47 We don't need, basically,
00:30:50 We simply need good science
00:30:53 We would desperately
00:30:55 to find the solution,
00:30:58 We don't need philosophy there,
00:30:59 because the threat
00:31:02 You cannot play
00:31:05 and say "No, this is not the"...
00:31:06 You know what I mean.
00:31:08 It's simply our life would be...
00:31:09 or okay, the more vulgar, even,
00:31:11 simpler science fiction
00:31:14 It's kind of "Armageddon"
00:31:17 No, "Deep lmpact."
00:31:18 A big comet threatening
00:31:21 You don't need philosophy here.
00:31:22 You need... I don't know.
00:31:24 To be a little bit naive,
00:31:26 Strong atomic bombs
00:31:29 I think it's maybe too utopian.
00:31:31 But you know what I mean.
00:31:32 I mean the threat is there,
00:31:34 In such a situation,
00:31:37 I don't think that philosophers
00:31:41 but I think this was
00:31:43 not in this common sense
00:31:44 that philosophers
00:31:47 What is philosophy?
00:31:48 Philosophy is not
00:31:51 some crazy exercise
00:31:54 and then you can adopt
00:31:57 We, through scientists,
00:31:58 are dealing with actual,
00:32:02 Philosophers just ask stupid metaphysical
00:32:05 play with absolute truths,
00:32:07 which we all know
00:32:09 No, I think philosophy's
00:32:11 Philosophy asks
00:32:13 the true philosophy.
00:32:15 How does a philosopher approach
00:32:18 It's not "Are we free or not?"
00:32:20 "Is there God or not?"
00:32:22 It asks a simple question,
00:32:24 which will be called
00:32:27 What does it mean to be free?
00:32:29 So this is what philosophy
00:32:32 It just asks, when we
00:32:37 when we do certain acts,
00:32:40 what is the implicit
00:32:44 It doesn't ask these
00:32:47 "Is there truth?"
00:32:48 No. The question is,
00:32:49 "What do you mean
00:32:53 So you can see, it's a very
00:32:56 Philosophers are not the madmen
00:32:58 who search for some eternal truth.
00:33:32 What we encounter here, I think,
00:33:34 is precisely Lacan's reversal
00:33:38 of the famous Dostoyevsky model,
00:33:40 "If God doesn't exist,
00:33:43 If God doesn't exist,
00:33:47 How? On the one hand,
00:33:49 again, you are allowed
00:33:52 to have a full life
00:33:54 but in order, precisely,
00:33:57 you should avoid
00:33:59 So at the end,
00:34:02 You cannot eat fat,
00:34:03 you cannot have nothing
00:34:06 So today's hedonism combines
00:34:10 It is no longer the old notion
00:34:12 of the right measure
00:34:16 Like sex, yes,
00:34:19 Proper measure.
00:34:20 No, it's something
00:34:22 It's a kind of immediate
00:34:24 of the two extremes,
00:34:26 like... as if action
00:34:31 The very thing
00:34:34 should already be
00:34:37 the medicine.
00:34:39 The ultimate example
00:34:40 I encountered recently
00:34:42 I don't know if you can buy it
00:34:45 is chocolate laxative.
00:34:47 And there it says
00:34:49 "Do you have still constipation?
00:34:51 Eat more of this chocolate."
00:34:54 The thing is already
00:34:58 And the negative proof
00:35:00 of the calamity
00:35:02 is the fact that today,
00:35:04 the true unconstrained
00:35:06 in all its main forms...
00:35:08 drugs, free sex, smoking...
00:35:10 is emerging as the main danger.
00:36:00 The traditional notion
00:36:03 is that, because of some
00:36:05 you internalized,
00:36:08 with paternal or other
00:36:11 you cannot set yourself
00:36:15 Pleasure is not accessible for you.
00:36:17 It is accessible to you
00:36:20 of feeling guilty and so on.
00:36:22 So, then, the idea is,
00:36:24 psychoanalysis allows you
00:36:25 to suspend, overcome
00:36:29 so that it enables you
00:36:32 The problem today
00:36:33 is that the commandment
00:36:38 enjoy in different ways.
00:36:39 It can be sex and enjoyment,
00:36:42 consumption, commodity enjoyment,
00:36:44 up to spiritual enjoyment,
00:36:47 And I think
00:36:50 is not how to get rid
00:36:53 and to be able
00:36:56 The problem is how to get rid
00:37:00 Organizations,
00:37:01 such as the New York
00:37:04 have helped gain
00:37:06 for theories considered radical
00:37:08 when first advanced
00:37:10 by Dr. Sigmund Freud.
00:37:14 The relationship
00:37:17 and disturbed adult behavior
00:37:18 has been clearly traced
00:37:20 as Dr. Rene Spitz of New York.
00:37:22 Distressing experiences
00:37:26 may set up patterns
00:37:28 which in later life
00:37:32 Such conflicts lead to the same
00:37:38 which was felt as a child.
00:37:40 When such conflicts
00:37:43 preventing him
00:37:47 he is said to have a neurosis.
00:37:50 Let us see
00:37:57 My eternal fear
00:37:59 is that if,
00:38:01 I stopped talking,
00:38:02 you know, the whole
00:38:06 would disintegrate.
00:38:07 People would think
00:38:09 and nothing there.
00:38:10 This is my fear,
00:38:12 as if I am nothing
00:38:15 to be somebody,
00:38:17 and has to be hyperactive
00:38:19 just to fascinate people enough
00:38:24 so that they don't notice
00:38:33 Well?
00:38:36 - Okay. You also, you also.
00:38:39 One of the big reproaches
00:38:41 is that it's only a theory
00:38:45 of individual pathological
00:38:48 and that applying psychoanalysis
00:38:51 to other cultural
00:38:54 is theoretically illegitimate.
00:38:59 It asks in what way
00:39:03 have to relate
00:39:06 not just in the sense
00:39:08 but in the sense
00:39:12 to exist as a person.
00:39:14 You are, under quotation marks,
00:39:17 normal individual person
00:39:19 only being able to relate
00:39:27 What is to be interpreted
00:39:30 is that everything
00:39:32 That is to say
00:39:33 when Freud says,
00:39:36 civilization and its discontent,
00:39:38 or more literally,
00:39:42 he means that it's not just
00:39:46 we socialize ourself normally.
00:39:47 Some idiots didn't make it.
00:39:50 Oh, they have to be normalized.
00:39:51 Culture as such,
00:39:53 in order to establish
00:39:57 what appears as normal
00:40:01 involves a whole series
00:40:03 of pathological cuts,
00:40:06 There is, again,
00:40:10 uneasiness:
00:40:11 We are out of joint,
00:40:13 in culture as such,
00:40:15 which means, again,
00:40:17 that there is no normal culture.
00:40:20 Culture as such
00:41:12 When people ask me
00:41:14 why do I combine
00:41:16 my first answer is,
00:41:19 I think, for example,
00:41:20 that it's only through
00:41:22 the strict psychoanalytic
00:41:26 that we can really grasp
00:41:29 with his notion
00:41:32 It's, I think, precisely
00:41:35 like, again, fantasy...
00:41:38 fantasy in the strict
00:41:41 or excess "plus de joie,"
00:41:44 and so on and so on.
00:41:45 The real...
00:41:47 that we can understand
00:41:51 like new fundamentalist
00:41:55 like the way our so-called
00:41:59 are functioning.
00:42:00 Again, here,
00:42:03 especially the way
00:42:05 it was conceptualized
00:42:07 The psychoanalytic notion
00:42:09 as injunction to enjoy
00:42:13 not as a properly
00:42:15 is of great help.
00:42:17 So again, I think
00:42:20 in his Freudian theory
00:42:23 in its traditional configuration,
00:42:26 was appropriate to explain
00:42:31 which relied to some kind
00:42:37 of sexual control,
00:42:39 then Lacan is perfect to explain
00:42:43 the paradoxes of permissive
00:43:54 When did you have the last meal...
00:43:56 breakfast... or down there?
00:43:58 Down there.
00:44:00 No, no, I mean, one,
00:44:02 we should maybe go down there.
00:44:04 Or do you know any...
00:44:05 At the place
00:44:08 they do have good menus,
00:44:10 like very nice ones,
00:44:13 - They are not bad.
00:44:15 Sorry?
00:44:16 Degenerate.
00:44:18 You'll turn into monkeys.
00:44:20 There is a table free here
00:44:22 if you want to be
00:44:24 Aqua Congas.
00:44:26 - Aqua Congas?
00:44:28 Why shouldn't I order?
00:44:29 Could you put it there?
00:44:30 No, I mean, where to put it.
00:44:32 - You want to show it?
00:44:34 Why do you want to...
00:44:35 Why did you say it was
00:44:38 that so many people came?
00:44:39 No, in the simple sense
00:44:41 that I have this terrible feeling
00:44:44 that they expect something
00:44:46 and I wonder what.
00:44:48 Many leftists expect
00:44:51 I will teach them what to do.
00:44:53 Shit, what do I know?
00:44:55 Some people expect...
00:44:56 You feel like that's what
00:44:59 - Specifically?
00:45:00 It's a simple
00:45:02 Wait a minute. 2,000 people...
00:45:05 although I think
00:45:06 whatever, thousand people
00:45:09 the same interest in Lacan
00:45:13 - Can I ask you a simple question?
00:45:16 If you were to have a daughter,
00:45:18 would you allow this guy
00:45:21 Be honest.
00:45:26 I hate the way I appear.
00:45:28 In some documents,
00:45:30 It's really as a kind
00:45:32 that I appear, you know.
00:45:33 You think they were expecting
00:45:36 just a sort of political advisor?
00:45:38 No, the problem is,
00:45:41 - I feel it as if it's a fake.
00:45:43 Not in the sense
00:45:46 that I don't mean it,
00:45:47 but my heart is not in it.
00:45:49 The book that I really
00:45:52 was the one on Hegel...
00:45:54 - "Ticklish Subjects."
00:45:56 And that part of the message
00:45:59 You can immediately see also
00:46:02 For example, of my last books,
00:46:04 the one that I really loved,
00:46:07 That one is doing
00:46:10 But that's what I love.
00:46:12 No, we didn't yet, no?
00:46:14 I'll tell you...
00:46:16 Is this just drinks?
00:46:19 First you should look here,
00:46:20 You have calarinas,
00:46:24 ensalada césar.
00:46:35 This is just for people
00:46:37 and hopefully to get out.
00:46:38 So that is why you have it?
00:46:40 So when people open the door,
00:46:41 Yeah, there is a small hope
00:46:45 That's the only fun.
00:46:46 Has it ever worked?
00:46:48 - Yeah.
00:46:49 As a matter of fact, yeah.
00:46:50 Some people
00:46:52 My big worry is not to be ignored,
00:46:56 but to be accepted.
00:46:58 When I appear to be sarcastic,
00:47:00 the point is not
00:47:03 What is not to be
00:47:04 is the very form of sarcasm.
00:47:06 It's the form of the joke
00:47:08 which masks the effect
00:47:10 But people still have this idea
00:47:12 that this guy did some big crimes.
00:47:15 No.
00:47:16 Of course it's not
00:47:18 that I'm simply a Stalinist.
00:47:20 It would be crazy,
00:47:22 But...
00:47:24 obviously, there is
00:47:29 that it's not simply a joke.
00:47:32 When I say the only chance
00:47:33 that the left appropriate fascism,
00:47:36 it's not a cheap joke.
00:47:37 The point is to avoid the trap
00:47:41 of the standard
00:47:43 Freedom versus
00:47:45 discipline, and so on,
00:47:46 to rehabilitate
00:47:49 collective order, subordination,
00:47:52 I don't think
00:48:06 Often, friends tell me,
00:48:08 "But why do you provoke
00:48:11 Why don't you simply
00:48:13 that, of course,
00:48:16 I tell them,
00:48:18 as an abstract theoretical"...
00:48:21 not even theoretical...
00:48:22 intellectual, whatever, statement.
00:48:24 But it doesn't work like that.
00:48:26 For example,
00:48:28 my God, I've probably
00:48:32 about its most horrible
00:48:35 than most of the people
00:48:38 And that's my wager here,
00:48:39 that sorry, the only way
00:48:42 If you say, "Of course
00:48:45 There are just some attitudes
00:48:48 which were traditional
00:48:50 but fascism appropriated them,"
00:48:53 I think it doesn't have
00:48:55 the desired precise
00:48:57 It enables the liberal consensus
00:49:02 You must say it
00:49:47 One hour be enough,
00:50:18 These are, of course, again,
00:50:21 I stole two of them today.
00:50:23 I went to wash my hair,
00:50:25 and then I was
00:50:27 and then the woman hairdresser
00:50:30 and told me, "Why don't I
00:50:33 I enjoyed it,
00:50:35 as if I paid for masturbation.
00:50:38 - Masturbating is so obscene.
00:50:42 But it was relaxing. It is nice.
00:50:44 - Really?
00:50:48 My God, where are you?
00:50:50 This reminds me of socialism,
00:50:52 carrying water
00:51:28 Really?
00:51:30 Yeah, because they were
00:51:31 You see? We were not late.
00:51:32 I realize it,
00:51:34 But they wait for us,
00:51:36 Yeah, they didn't
00:51:39 They were waiting for us.
00:51:42 Let's start as soon as possible.
00:51:44 Let's go in.
00:51:52 The majority of academics
00:51:53 who are obsessed
00:51:54 "The left needs a new answer":
00:51:56 Isn't it basically
00:51:58 "We want a radical revolution,
00:52:00 but at the same time,
00:52:02 we want our relatively
00:52:05 to go on undisturbed"?
00:52:07 Like precisely as already
00:52:10 "We want revolution
00:52:13 There is, I notice,
00:52:15 a fundamental difference between
00:52:16 the standard plurality
00:52:20 which progressive liberals...
00:52:21 What does it mean?
00:52:22 Isn't it in a way false
00:52:24 even to expect such a clear
00:52:28 in the sense of "All we need
00:52:30 to tell us what to do,
00:52:32 and then capitalism
00:52:34 we'll have socialism," and so on?
00:52:36 I'm too stupid.
00:52:38 - I'm sorry.
00:52:40 Thank you very much.
00:52:42 Again, I have to accept this,
00:52:45 again, almost Lacanian
00:52:48 which is that
00:52:51 but I don't really master...
00:52:54 People see things in me.
00:52:56 They have some expectations.
00:52:58 There may be political
00:53:00 that I will provide the formula,
00:53:02 the big question that everybody's
00:53:05 from a leftist intellectual...
00:53:06 "What should we do?"...
00:53:07 or some kind
00:53:09 to help them psychologically,
00:53:11 or theoretical amusement
00:53:13 in the sense of many dirty jokes
00:53:17 And I honestly accept that.
00:53:19 I think that my reaction
00:53:22 should be not so much
00:53:25 they're missing my big point,"
00:53:26 but my duty's basically
00:53:29 to try and occupy the position
00:53:33 which is basically to play,
00:53:36 in a way of transference,
00:53:38 and to undermine,
00:53:41 to make it clear to them
00:53:42 that the question is not
00:53:46 but are these expectations
00:53:49 What this expectation should
00:53:53 It was usually
00:53:57 was like it was Nixon,
00:53:59 who had to do it with China.
00:54:01 This paradox...
00:54:03 It was de Gaulle,
00:54:06 - Got out of Algeria.
00:54:08 Algeria, yes.
00:54:13 You really are an intellectual
00:54:15 so I had to touch you.
00:54:16 Sorry, sorry. Interrupting.
00:54:17 I'm the editor of #Progress.#
00:54:19 - Of?
00:54:21 journal of socialist ideas.
00:54:23 - I brought you a copy.
00:54:26 - I was really impressed.
00:54:29 He needs a shower.
00:54:33 It was over there.
00:54:43 Who knows here?
00:54:45 I'm sorry.
00:54:48 Okay, sir, you know the guy
00:54:51 the Chinese guy?
00:54:53 "Double Indemnity" is not
00:54:59 "Being There" also, I think,
00:55:02 "Being There," you know,
00:55:04 It should be...
00:55:06 Hal Ashby.
00:55:07 No, this is
00:55:10 You know the ape
00:55:12 Fuck it, I don't get it here.
00:55:15 Ah. U.S. '70s. "Being There."
00:55:21 It's a wonderful movie,
00:55:23 and look, my anal character.
00:55:24 The price is okay,
00:55:28 What more do I need?
00:55:30 "Fountainhead" is the best
00:55:33 Then the best German movie
00:55:37 would be "Opfergang."
00:55:40 This is the sacrificial path,
00:55:43 from '44, by Veit Harlan,
00:55:46 So we have Ayn Rand, a Nazi,
00:55:48 and then... unfortunately,
00:55:52 it is "lvan the Terrible,"
00:55:55 I would say these three
00:55:56 are the best movies
00:55:58 Ah, this one I want,
00:56:02 So we have these two.
00:56:04 That will be it, I think.
00:56:07 How about if I buy them
00:56:09 No, wait a minute.
00:56:10 Poor American girl,
00:56:12 Who pays for that?
00:56:14 - Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:56:16 - Okay, with pleasure.
00:56:17 No, let it be the eternal
00:56:20 Did I suspect this
00:56:23 If you were not
00:56:27 I would in the last minute
00:56:30 I have too many things to carry."
00:56:31 This one is a little
00:56:34 Shut up, or you will
00:56:36 I'm so sad that l...
00:56:39 What is this?
00:56:40 My God, I would love to have
00:56:43 - Let me buy this...
00:56:46 Where? Which one?
00:56:48 Sorry, can I buy this one also?
00:57:07 Oh, sorry. Fuck off.
00:57:10 What are you working on
00:57:12 What's the new book?
00:57:14 The mega... basically,
00:57:17 Big, big mega thing.
00:57:19 How far along are you?
00:57:21 Pretty close to the end.
00:57:23 It will be mega.
00:57:25 One part philosophy, theology,
00:57:28 one part cognitivism...
00:57:31 and one part obscenity,
00:57:35 - What's it gonna be called?
00:57:37 Maybe "The Parallax View,"
00:57:39 but I must check it
00:57:40 see if there are already
00:57:43 named "The Parallax View," no?
00:57:45 I must look into that aspect.
00:57:47 What does parallax view mean?
00:57:49 It's very simple.
00:57:51 It comes as close as possible
00:57:54 You know that...
00:57:57 When you mistake
00:58:01 You look at an object.
00:58:03 It appears that the object itself
00:58:05 but in reality, it's just
00:58:09 Like lunar, stellar,
00:58:14 The idea is, your shift in your
00:58:19 You perceive it
00:58:21 But, of course,
00:58:23 that it is in the object
00:58:26 because object-subject
00:58:28 So what interests me
00:58:32 like you move from one
00:58:34 There is no way
00:58:39 And then I develop this
00:58:43 in philosophy,
00:58:44 In cognitive sciences,
00:58:46 either you look
00:58:49 or you open the scar,
00:58:51 you see the stupid
00:58:53 But you really cannot
00:58:55 and you really cannot...
00:58:57 Even if scientifically
00:58:59 you really cannot accept
00:59:03 that you see.
00:59:04 So if we distilled
00:59:07 what would they be?
00:59:09 Three of my best books
00:59:11 are unfortunately four,
00:59:14 "Sublime Object,"
00:59:16 "Ticklish Subject,"
00:59:18 This is the serious
00:59:20 with little pieces
00:59:22 But this is what I would...
00:59:25 although I'm more and more
00:59:27 It's still too liberal.
00:59:29 I'm for democracy there.
00:59:32 I think there was a thing
00:59:35 which was bad,
00:59:36 and I think there should
00:59:39 My God, what am I talking there?
00:59:41 You know that Marx Brothers joke
00:59:42 "I would never be a member
00:59:44 You know, if I were not myself,
01:00:23 I have a very complicated ritual
01:00:29 It's psychologically
01:00:34 so I have to trick myself.
01:00:36 I operate a very simple strategy
01:00:38 which, at least with me,
01:00:40 I put down ideas,
01:00:42 but I put them down usually
01:00:45 like the line of thought already
01:00:48 So up to a certain point,
01:00:51 I'm telling myself, "No,
01:00:53 I'm just putting down ideas."
01:00:55 Then, at a certain point,
01:00:57 I tell myself, "Everything
01:01:00 Now I just have to edit it."
01:01:02 So that's the idea,
01:01:04 I put down notes, I edit it.
01:01:06 Writing disappears.
01:01:11 I'm sorry. Please.
01:01:13 Just be loud enough.
01:01:23 Good question,
01:01:25 that now I will say,
01:01:28 No, it's much more serious
01:01:30 Let's be quite frank.
01:01:31 At a certain superficial level,
01:01:34 but me and my friends,
01:01:36 I don't think you can...
01:01:39 even imagine how noninfluential
01:01:44 which is why
01:01:46 how many, whoever they are...
01:01:49 the enemies...
01:01:51 portray us Lacanians
01:01:53 as some kind of a phalogocentric
01:01:56 It's very fashionable
01:01:59 as kind of a dogmatic
01:02:02 For example, yesterday,
01:02:05 a differently improvised version
01:02:07 at Columbia in New York,
01:02:08 a lady kindly towards the end
01:02:12 Her problem was, why am I
01:02:34 Which belief?
01:02:39 Perfect.
01:02:42 Perfect question.
01:02:43 Okay, I defy you
01:02:45 with a very simple empirical,
01:02:47 in the best Anglo-Saxon
01:02:50 Apart from this brief conflict
01:02:52 between Gayatri Spivak
01:02:55 could you name me one Derridian
01:02:57 who made a small critical
01:03:01 Rudolph Gasche? Avital Ronell?
01:03:02 Name somewhere,
01:03:05 Why are we dogmatic?
01:03:08 Name me one point
01:03:11 where Sam Weber makes an ironic critical
01:03:16 Name me one point
01:03:18 Name me one point
01:03:21 So why are we...
01:03:24 Why am I dogmatically attached
01:03:28 Why did you think
01:03:30 I am a Lacanian.
01:03:32 You are knocking
01:03:34 You don't have to prove
01:03:39 "But he's a Lacanian."
01:03:40 I am a card-carrying Lacanian.
01:03:43 Something is going on here,
01:03:46 and I just wanted to draw
01:03:48 how all this popular,
01:03:49 and I think so to give you now
01:03:53 I think that I admit it.
01:03:55 There is a clownish
01:03:57 like they put it
01:03:59 Marx Brother, or whatever.
01:04:00 All that, I maybe
01:04:04 But nonetheless,
01:04:06 because I notice
01:04:09 when there are some stupid
01:04:12 a kind of a terrible urge,
01:04:16 to make me appear
01:04:20 And the true question would be,
01:04:22 where does this urge come from?
01:04:25 Why is there this necessity
01:04:27 as somebody who can
01:04:32 And even my publishers buy it.
01:04:34 You know that my Lenin book...
01:04:37 was almost turned down by Verso?
01:04:39 Why?
01:04:41 First, they always, at Verso,
01:04:44 "Oh, you are just making jokes,"
01:04:46 then I told them, "Okay, now you
01:04:48 Their reproach was,
01:04:51 Nobody will buy the book."
01:04:52 So, you know, much more
01:04:56 is going on here.
01:04:58 It's quite a complex phenomenon.
01:05:02 I'm almost tempted to say
01:05:05 is a resistance against
01:05:08 And I think it's my duty,
01:05:12 to do a kind
01:05:14 of myself as a popular comedian
01:05:26 Let's hope we can enter here.
01:05:29 I don't know how this
01:05:30 This is it.
01:05:34 Here you should do
01:05:37 like from "Vertigo."
01:05:38 I saw two, three times
01:05:41 because when it was still open,
01:05:43 you took there
01:05:45 And often I saw here
01:05:48 some policemen
01:05:50 and an object here, covered.
01:05:53 Because you will immediately
01:05:55 if you take the shot up.
01:05:58 That's it.
01:06:00 From up there, it was practical
01:06:02 Go up, you jump down,
01:06:04 and it's kind of a nice,
01:06:08 It's not this spectacle
01:06:09 that on the street,
01:06:12 You go here, and you jump down.
01:06:14 Of course, my idea
01:06:17 You want to kill yourself.
01:06:19 We prevent so that
01:06:22 $5.00, no small children
01:06:24 I even have the idea that,
01:06:26 in this society of biopolitics,
01:06:31 where they ask you...
01:06:33 In order to get married:
01:06:34 You don't have AIDS,
01:06:37 Obviously, doesn't work,
01:06:39 because if it were to work,
01:06:40 I would never be allowed
01:06:42 But they should do it the same
01:06:44 like if you want
01:06:46 I was thinking about it.
01:06:48 I think that only people...
01:06:49 some medical...
01:06:51 or psychiatric
01:06:55 should decide is it a case
01:07:00 or just a short crisis,
01:07:01 like you were just dropped
01:07:05 and there is a reasonable hope
01:07:07 that it's a momentary depression,
01:07:09 then, in two or three weeks,
01:07:11 So it can be medical crisis.
01:07:13 It can be this kind
01:07:15 or pure metaphysical suicide.
01:09:06 As a Marxist,
01:09:08 if somebody tells me
01:09:10 this is class propaganda
01:09:18 I never thought I'd have
01:09:20 - Thank you.